International Journal of Language and Linguistics

Submit a Manuscript

Publishing with us to make your research visible to the widest possible audience.

Propose a Special Issue

Building a community of authors and readers to discuss the latest research and develop new ideas.

Review Article |

Application of Variationist Sociolinguistic Method in SLA: A Research Overview of China and Abroad

Combining insights from variationist sociolinguistics and SLA, the present paper is situated within the SLA research which applies variationist sociolinguistic method. The quantitative research method in sociolinguistic variation theory provides a new perspective for the research of SLA. This paper expounds and analyzes the SLA research in the light of variation theory, particularly focusing on the variation research of interlanguage both in China and abroad, and further presents the application of variationist sociolinguistic method in interlanguage research. The combination of variation theory and SLA research is crucial to deepen the development of SLA research, specifically, in L2 learning and teaching to provide suggestions to L2 learners and teachers. In so doing, L2 learners do not use or underuse the appropriate form in context, such that there is a form-function mismatch in their interlanguage. Specifically, first, although the quantitative research methods in sociolinguistic variation theory provide a new perspective for second language acquisition research, it should not been regarded as the only effective way to study interlanguage variation. To accurately analyze the interlanguage of learners, sometimes other methods such as oral reports and participant ethnography are also needed. The combination of qualitative and quantitative methods can help obtain more reliable research results. Secondly, the phenomenon of variation should not only remain at the level of pronunciation, vocabulary, syntax, etc., and the writing system can also be studied as a phenomenon of variation. In the process of acquiring the target language, it is also worth exploring whether learners will imitate the writing habits of native speakers, or whether learners will be influenced by their own mother tongue to create new forms of writing. Finally, although the research findings on interlanguage variation have implications for classroom teaching, when applied to second language acquisition classrooms, teachers need to carefully consider their classroom applicability.

Variationist Sociolinguistic Method, SLA, Interlanguage, Sociolinguistic Variation Theory

APA Style

Yu, M. (2024). Application of Variationist Sociolinguistic Method in SLA: A Research Overview of China and Abroad. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 12(1), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20241201.12

ACS Style

Yu, M. Application of Variationist Sociolinguistic Method in SLA: A Research Overview of China and Abroad. Int. J. Lang. Linguist. 2024, 12(1), 7-15. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20241201.12

AMA Style

Yu M. Application of Variationist Sociolinguistic Method in SLA: A Research Overview of China and Abroad. Int J Lang Linguist. 2024;12(1):7-15. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20241201.12

Copyright © 2024 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Adamson H. D. 1989. Variation theory and second language acquisition [M]. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
2. Auerbach, E. 1993. Reexamining English only in the EL2 classroom [J]. TESOL Quarterly (27).
3. Bayley, R. 1996. Competing constraints on variation in the speech of adult Chinese learnersof English [A]. L2A and Linguistic Variation [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
4. Bayley, R. & Tarone. 2012. Variationist perspectives [A]. Gass & Mackey. Handbook of L2A [C]. New York: Routledge.
5. Beck, M. 1997. Regular verbs, past tense and frequency: tracking down a potential source of NS/NNS competence differences. Second Language Research 13: 93-115.
6. Beck, M. 1998. L2 acquisition and obligatory head movement: English-speaking learners of German and the local impairment hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20: 311-348.
7. Beebe, L. M. 1977. The influence of the listener on code-switching [J]. Language Learning (27).
8. Beebe, L. 1980. Socio linguistics variation and style shifting in L2A [J]. Language Learning (30).
9. Blackwell, S., & Quesada, M. (2012). Third-person subjects in native speakers’ and L2 learners’ narratives: Testing (and revising) the Givenness Hierarchy for Spanish [A]. In K. L. Geeslin & M. D´ıaz-Campos (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 14th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 142–164). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
10. Block. D. 2003. The Social Turn in L2A [M]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
11. Bo, W. 1997. On the Variation of Interlanguage [J]. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, (2): 5-11.
12. Broner, M. 2001. Impact of interlocutor and task on first and second language use in a Spanish immersion program (CARLA Working Paper No. 18) [R]. Minneapolis: CARLA.
13. Chen, C. 2011. A Study on Phonetic Variations in Thai Students’ Acquisition of Chinese Level and Falling Tones [J]. Journal of Research on Education for Ethnic Minorities, (1): 79-85.
14. Clahsen, H., S. Eissenbeiss & M. Penke 1996. Lexical learning in early syntactic development. In H. Clahsen (ed.), Generative Perspectives on Language Acquisition. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 129-159.
15. Cohen, A. D. 1984. On taking language tests: What the students report [J]. Language Testing (1).
16. Cohen, A. & Olshtain, E. 1981. Developing a measure of sociocultural competence: The case of apology [J]. Language Learning (31).
17. Connor, U. 1984. A research of cohesion and coherence in EL2 students’ writing [J]. Papers in Linguistics: International Journal of Human Communication (17).
18. Cumming, A. 1994. Alternatives in TESOL research: Descriptive, interpretive, and ideological orientations [J]. TESOL Quarterly (28).
19. Daming, X. & Jingwei, Z. & Hong, W. 2008. A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Lexical Variation in English Interlanguage [J]. Foreign Languages Research, (6): 1-9.
20. Daming, X. 1999. The Use of VRA in Bilingual Research: A Singapore Case [J]. Contemporary Linguistics, (3): 25-35.
21. Ehrlich, S. & Avery, P. & Yorio, C. 1989. Discourse structure and the negotiation of comprehensible input [J]. Studies in L2A (11).
22. Ellis, R. 1985. Understanding L2A [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Ellis, R. (1999). Item versus system learning: Explaining free variation [J]. Applied Linguistics, 20, 460–480.
24. Epstein, S. D., S. Flynn & G. Martohardjono. 1996. Second language acquisition: theoretical and experimental issues in contemporary research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19: 677-758.
25. Eubank, L. 1993/1994. On the transfer of parametric values in L2 development. Language Acquisition 3: 183–208.
26. Eubank, L., J. Bischof, A. Huffstutler, P. Leek & C. West. 1997. “Tom eats slowly cooked eggs”: thematic-verb raising in L2 knowledge. Language Acquisition 6: 171-199.
27. Gass, S., & Selinker, L. 1992. Language Transfer in Language Learning [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
28. Geeslin, K. L., & Gudmestad, A. (2010). An exploration of the range and frequency of occurrence of forms in potentially variable structures in second-language Spanish [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 433–463.
29. Hawkins, R. & C. Y. Chan. 1997. The partial availability of Universal Grammar in second language acquisition: The ‘failed functional features hypothesis’. Second Language Research 13: 187-226.
30. Hongjie, G. & Qinqin, Z. 2012. Variation in the Acquisition of the Indefinite Article by Chinese EFL Learners, [J]. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, (1): 54-58.
31. Hongjie, G. & Qinqin, Z. 2010. The Influence of Verb Saliency on Past Tense Marking in English Interlanguage [J]. Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice, (1): 6-13.
32. Hongjie, G. & Min, W. 2010. The Variation of (-t d) Deletion in EFL Interlanguage [J]. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, (5): 73-78.
33. Hornberger, 1987. Hymes’s Linguistics and Ethnography in Education [M]. University of Pennsylvania.
34. Huebner, T. 1983. A Longitudinal Analysis of the Acquisition of English [M]. Ann Arbor: Karoma Publishers.
35. Huebner, T. 1985. System and variability in interlanguage syntax [J]. Language Learning (35).
36. Hui, H. & Jinshi, S. 2016. The Contribution of Sociolinguistic Theory to Research in Second Language Acquisition [J]. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education, (3): 23-27.
37. Jie, Y. & Jing, L. & Lin, Z. 2012. A Study on the Variation of the Perfect Aspect of Verbs Based on Modified Adverbial Types [J]. GUANGXI SHEHUI KEXUE, (8): 157-160.
38. Jinting, C. 2004. The studies of tense / aspect acquisition [J]. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, (5): 10-15.
39. Jinting, C. 2004. The Influence of the Chinese Aspect Mark “le” on the General Past Tense Mark in English Interlanguage [J], Foreign Languages Research, (1): 23-27.
40. Jinting, C. & Lixia, Z. 2004. The Theoretical Frameworks for Interlanguage Variation Study: Inheritance and Development [J]. FOREIGN LANGUAGE RESEARCH, (3): 88-95.
41. Jinting, C. & Hui, C. 2005. The Effect of Verb Salience on the Simple Past Marking English Interlanguage [J]. Journal of Sichuan International Studies University, (6): 92-97.
42. Johnston, M. 1985. Syntactic and Morphological Progressions in Learner English [M]. Canberra: Department of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs.
43. Kimberly, L. Gee, Avizia, Y. L. 2014. Sociolinguistic and L2A: Learning to Use Language in Context [M]. New York, NY: Routledge.
44. Krashen, S. 1985. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications [M]. London: Longman.
45. Labov, W. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City [M]. Washington, DC.: Center for Applied Linguistics.
46. Lightbown, P. 1985. Great expectations: Second-language acquisition research and classroom teaching [J]. AppliedLinguistics (6).
47. Li, M. 2005. Variability in Pronouncing Chinese blade-palatalinitials by Japanese SLA Learners [J]. Chinese Teaching in the World, (1): 97-105.
48. Li, T. 2016. Review of Domestic Research on Interlanguage Variation [J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing (Social Sciences Edition, (6): 25-30.
49. Long, M. H. (1990). The least a second language acquisition theory needs to explain. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 649–666.
50. Lunan, W. 2000. Research on Variations in Second Language Acquisition [J]. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, (5): 32-37.
51. Lyster, R. (1994). The effect of functional-analytic teaching on aspects of French immersion students’ sociolinguistic competence [J]. Applied Linguistics, 15: 263–287.
52. Manchun, D. 1999. A Debate on Interlanguage Variability and Its Implication [J]. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, (1): 15-18.
53. Martin H. & Isabelle L. & Vera R. 2006. The SLA of a phonological variable: the case of /l/ deletion in French [J]. French Language Studies (16) 1–24.
54. Martin H. & Mougeon, R. & Dewaele, J. M. 2013. Sociolinguistics and Second Language Acquisition [A]. The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics Edited by Robert Bayley, Richard Cameron, and Ceil Lucas.
55. Meisel, J. 1997. The acquisition of the syntax of negation in French and German: contrasting first and second language acquisition. Second Language Research 13: 227-263.
56. Meisel, J. 1998. Revisiting Universal Grammar. Paper presented at Second Language Research Forum 1998 (SLRF 98), Hawaii, Oct. 1998.
57. Mengli, S. & Qiang, W. 1998. The Variability of Interlanguage and Second Language Acquisition [J]. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, (1): 43-44.
58. Min, H. 2011. A study of the variation of the plural marking in Chinese EFL students’ writing [J]. Modern Foreign Languages (Quarterly), (2): 187-194.
59. Pennycook, A. 1994. The Cultural Politics of Teaching English As an International Language [M]. London: Longman.
60. Platzack, C. 1996. The initial hypothesis of syntax: a minimalist perspective on language acquisition and attrition. In H. Clahsen (ed.), Generative perspectives on language acquisition: empirical findings, theoretical considerations, cross-linguistic comparisons. Amsterdam/Philadelpia: Benjamins, 369-414.
61. Preston, D. R. 1996. Variationist perspectives on L2A [A]. In R. Bayley and D. R. Preston (eds.), L2A and Linguistic Variation [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
62. Preston, D. (1989). Sociolinguistics and Second Language Acquisition [M]. Oxford: Blackwell.
63. Preston, D. 2002. A Variationist perspective on L2A: Psycholinguistic concerns [A]. In Kaplan (ed.). Oxford Handbook of Applied Linguistics [C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64. Prévost, P & L. White. 2000. Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research 16: 103-133.
65. Regan, V. 1996. Variation in French interlanguage: Alongitudinal research of sociolinguistic competence [A]. In 55. Bayley, 57. R. & Preston (eds.). L2A and Linguistic Variation [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
66. Regan, V. (2004). From speech community back to classroom: What variation analysis can tell us about the role of context in the acquisition of French as a foreign language [A]. In: J.-M. Dewaele (ed.), Focus on French as a Foreign Language. Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 191–209.
67. Rehner, K. & Mougeon, R. & Nadasdi. 2003. The learning of sociolinguistic variation by advanced FL2 learners: The case of nous vs. on in immersion French [J]. Studies in L2A (25).
68. Sankoff, D. 1988. Sociolinguistics and syntactic variation [A]. In F. J. Newmeyer (ed.) Linguistics: TheCambridge Survey, vol. 4, Language: The Socio-cultural Context [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69. Schwartz, B. & R. Sprouse. 1994. Word order and nominative case in nonnative language acquisition: a longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German interlanguage. In T. Hoekstra & B. D. Schwartz (eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 317-368.
70. Schachter, J. 1986. In search of systematicity in interlanguage production [J]. Studies in L2A (8).
71. Selinker, L. 1972. Interlanguage [J]. International Review of Applied Linguistics (10).
72. Shaolong, L. 1998. A Case Study of Learner Errors in the Acquisition of English Parts of Speech [J]. Modern Foreign Languages, (2): 66-81.
73. Shanzhi, Y. 2005. The Syntactic Operations of English Interrogative Sentences and Variations in L2 Acquisition [J]. Foreign Language Education, (1): 12-1.
74. Slabakova. R. 2009. What is easy and what is hard toacquire in a second language? [C]// Melissa Bowles etal. Proceedings of the 10th Generative Approaches toSecond Language Acquisition Conference. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project: 280-294.
75. Sorace. A. 2011. Pinning down the concept of ‘interface' in bilingualism [J]. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1: 1-33.
76. Sorace. A &. F. Filiaci. 2006. Anaphora resolution in near native speakers of Italian [J]. Second Language Research 22: 339-368.
77. Spada, N. 1990. A look at the research process in classroom observation: A case research [A]. In C. Brumfit & R. Mitchell (Eds.), ELT Documents: Research in the Language Classroom [C]. Exmouth, England: Modern English Publications.
78. Tarone, E. & G. Liu. 1995. Situational context, variation, and L2A theory [A]. In Cook, G. & B. Seidlhofer (eds.). Principles and Practice in L2A [C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
79. Tarone, E. 1985. Variability in interlanguage use: A research of style-shifting in morphology andsyntax [J]. Language Learning (35).
80. Towell, R.&Hawkins, R. 1994. methodes to L2A [M]. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
81. Tsimpli, I. M. 1992. Functional Categories and Maturation: The Prefunctional Stage of Language Acquisition. Doctoral Dissertation, University College London.
82. Vainikka, A. & M. Young-Scholten. 1996. Gradual development in L2 phrase structure. Second Language Research 12: 7–39.
83. Van Patten, B. 1990. Attending to form and content in the input: An experiment in consciousness [J]. Studies in L2A (12).
84. Weinreich, U. & Labov, W. &Herzog. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change [A]. W. Lehman and Y. Malkiel (eds.), Directions for a Historical Linguistics [C]. Austin: University of Texas Press.
85. Yan, Y. 2010. The Study of Situational Context Effect on Acquisition of Third Tone of Mandarin by American Students [J]. Chinese Language Learning, (1): 96-104.
86. Yanfeng, Y. 2010. The Influence of Sentiment on the General Past Tense Markers in English Interlanguage: A Study Based on Oral Corpus [J]. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, (2): 54-59.
87. Young, R. 1991. Variation in Interlanguage Morphology [M]. New York: Peter Lang.
88. Yu, L. On the Variability of the Second Language Acquisition of Chinese Ditransitive Constructions [J]. Chinese Teaching in the World, (1): 88-101.
89. Yuan, B. 2010. Domain-wide or variable-dependent vulnerability of the semantics-syntax interface in L2 acquisition? Evidence from wh-words used as existential polarity words in L2 Chinese grammars [J]. Second Language Research, (26): 219-260.
90. Yuan, B. & E. Dugarova. 2012. Wh-topicalization at the syntax-discourse interface in English speakers’ L2 Chinese grammars [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, (34): 533-560.
91. Zhengguang, L. & Yujuan, F. & Jian, C. 2013. The Socio - cognitive Perspective of Second Language Acquisition and Its Theoretical Sources [J]. Journal of Foreign Languages, (6): 42-52.