Volume 3, Issue 1, January 2015, Page: 22-26
Reading Process as First Stage of the Publication Industry: Have Tunisian Novice Researchers Acquired the Appropriate Reading Skills to do a Good Literature Review
Chokri Smaoui, RU: DISCOURSE ANALYSIS. Faculty of Letters and Humanities of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia
Elhoucine Essefi, National Engineering School of Sfax, Road of Soukra, km 4 Zipcode3038, Sfax, Tunisia
Received: Sep. 23, 2014;       Accepted: Oct. 23, 2014;       Published: Jan. 27, 2015
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijll.20150301.14      View  2453      Downloads  118
This works predicted, by studying the deep rooted reasons behind difficulties of Tunisian novice researchers with efficient reading of the scientific genre, that difficulties are rooted in their educational system. It simulates the line of thinking of the strong version of the Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis (CAH). The common point between the method of this work and the strong version of the CAH lies in using a predictive approach. By confusing its social and scientific status, this system neglected the importance of English in scientific communication. Furthermore, the weak programs and unskilled teachers in terms of scientific genre deepened these difficulties. Consequently, this study based on Contrastive Linguistics foresaw that Tunisian novice researchers are more than likely to fail doing the first and vital stage of the publication industry: the literature review.
Publication Industry, Language Acquisition (LA), Contrastive Linguistics, Scientific Discourse, Scientific Status, Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis (CAH), Scientific Genre, Educational System, Social Status
To cite this article
Chokri Smaoui, Elhoucine Essefi, Reading Process as First Stage of the Publication Industry: Have Tunisian Novice Researchers Acquired the Appropriate Reading Skills to do a Good Literature Review, International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Vol. 3, No. 1, 2015, pp. 22-26. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20150301.14
Barnett, M. A. (1989). More than meets the eye: Foreign language reading theory and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
Bazerman, C. (1985). Physicist reading physics: schema-laden purposes and purpose-laden schema. Written Communication, 2, 3–23.
Carrell, P. L. (1998). Can reading strategies be successfully taught? The Language Teacher (online), 22/3, 55 paragraphs. Available: http://langue.hyper.chubu.ac.jp./jalt/pub/tlt/98/mar/carrell.html.
Chen, Q., & Donin, J. (1997). Discourse processing of first and second language biology texts: effects of language proficiency and domain-specific knowledge. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 209–227.
Cohen, A. D. (1987). Using verbal reports in research on language learning. In C. Faerch, & G. Kasper (Eds.), Introspection in second language research (pp. 82–95). Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
Corder, S. (1974). ‘Idiosyncratic Dialects and Error Analysis’. In Richards, J. (Ed.). Error analysis: Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition. 158-171. Essex: Longman.
Daoud, M. (1991). The processing of EST discourse: Arabic and French speakers’ recognition of rhetorical relationships in Engineering texts. Unpublished PhD thesis. Los Angeles: University of California.
Dhieb-Henia, N. (2003). Evaluating the effectiveness of metacognitive strategy training for reading research articles in an ESP context. English for Specific Purposes, 22 (2003) 387–417.
Donin, J., & Silva, M. (1993). The relationship between first- and second-language reading comprehension of occupation-specific texts. Language Learning, 43, 373–401.
Golinkoff, R. M. (1975). A comparison of reading comprehension processes in good and poor comprehenders. Reading Research Quarterly, 11, 623–659.
Jiménez, R. T., Garcia, G. E., & Pearson, P. D. (1996). The reading strategies of bilingual Latina/o students who are successful English readers: opportunities and obstacles. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 90–112.
Pearson, P. D., & Fielding, L. (1991). Comprehension instruction. In R. Barr et al. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Volume II (pp. 815-860). New York: Longman.
Rankin, J. M. (1988). Designing thinking aloud strategies in ESL reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 4(2), 119-132.
Singleton, D. (2005). The critical period hypothesis : a coat of many colours. IRAL 43: 269-85.
Someren, M, Barnard, Y. V, and Sandberg, J. (1994). The Think Aloud Method (London, The Academia Press).
Stockwell, R.P., and Martin, J. W. (1965). The grammatical structure of English and Spanish. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wardaugh, R. (1970). The contrastive analysis hypothesis. TESOL Quarterly 4: 123-30.
Browse journals by subject