Volume 4, Issue 2, March 2016, Page: 80-88
Foreign Language Grammar Acquisition in the Context of the 21st Century
Yavor Yordanov Gueorguiev, Department of Arts, Languages and Literature, American University in Bulgaria, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Spain
Received: Jan. 22, 2016;       Accepted: Mar. 9, 2016;       Published: Mar. 23, 2016
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijll.20160402.16      View  4666      Downloads  153
One of the main concerns of current foreign language methodology is the effective grammar acquisition and the actual need for it. On other hand, the constant progress of mobile technology and the attractiveness of social media provide great opportunities for ubiquitous learning, which can complement the regular class work and motivate learners to practice and master the grammar contents in a foreign language. This study investigates the impact of the communicative approach on the learning traditions of Eastern countries, and concludes on the key role of technology in facilitating the development of grammar competence. The study interviewed more than 100 university students from 22 countries from Eastern Europe and Asia. Data show clear preference for the explicit learning and support the proposal for a mobile Application dedicated to the explication of grammar rules and to the interactive practice of different grammar contents in community through social media.
Explicit Learning, Grammar Acquisition, mLearning, Communicative Approach
To cite this article
Yavor Yordanov Gueorguiev, Foreign Language Grammar Acquisition in the Context of the 21st Century, International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Vol. 4, No. 2, 2016, pp. 80-88. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20160402.16
Copyright © 2016 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Swan, M. (1985) A critical look at the Communicative Approach (1), ELT Journal 39 (1): 2-12.
Gahin, G & Myhill, D. (2001) The Communicative Approach in Egypt: Exploring the Secrets of the Pyramids TEFL Journal, Volume 1, No: 2 (72-81).
Zhang, L. (2004) CLT in China: Frustration, Misconceptions, and Clarifications Hwa Kang Journal of TEFL Vol X, No: 9.
Pan, L., & Block, D. (2011). English as a "global language" in China: An investigation into learners' and teachers' language beliefs. System, 39(3), 391–402.
Li, P. (2004). Chinese EFL teachers perceptions of implementation of communicative language teaching at tertiary level. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University.
Liao, X. (2003). Chinese secondary school teachers' attitudes towards communicative language teaching and their classroom practices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Auckland, New Zealand. Retrieved February 12, 2008, from
Lu, Y. & Fehring, H. (2015) When and why EFL teachers use L1? International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 151-162, December.
Pham, Hoa. H. (2005) “Imported” Communicative Language Teaching: Implications for Local Teachers English Teaching Forum, Vol 43. No: 4 (2-13).
Adi, S.S. (2012) Communicative Language Teaching: Is it appropriate for Indonesian Context? Education.
Salazar, V., (2006) Gramática y enseñanza comunicativa del español LE, MarcoELE, N°2.
Besse, H. & Porquier, R. (1984) Grammaires et didactique des langues, Hatier, Credif. p.78.
Krashen, S (1981) Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning, University of Southern California, Pergamon Press Inc.
Martín Perís, E. (1998) Gramática y enseñanza de segundas lenguas, Carabela 43, 5-32.
Ellis, N. C., & Laporte, N. (1997). Contexts of acquisition: Effects of formal instruction and naturalistic exposure on second language acquisition. In A. M. B. de Groot and J. F. Kroll (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 53-83). Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Yu, M (2013)Teaching grammar using Focus on Form approach in communicative language teaching for Korean Middle School Students, University of Wisconsin-River Falls.
Yoon, Kyung-Eun, (2012) CLT Theories and Practices in EFL Curricula: a Case Study of Korea. Asian EFL Jounal 6.3 (2004): 1-16. Web. 1.
Mondal, K., M. (2012) A Comparative Study of Grammar Translation Method and Communicative Approach in Teaching English Language, New York Science Journal, 2012; 5(5).
Cooper, B. J. (2004). The enigma of the Chinese learner. Accounting Education, 13 (3), 289-310.
Izumi, S. (2002) Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study of ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 541–577.
Tajino, A. & Tajino, Y. (2000). Native and non-native: What can they offer? ELT Journal, 54(1), 3-11.
Valiente, C. (2008). Are students using the 'wrong' style of learning? A multicultural scrutiny for helping teachers to appreciate differences. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(1), 73-91.
Littlewood, W. (1981) Communicative Language Teaching. An Introduction Cambridge Language Teaching Library.
Gustafson, R. (1983) A Comparison of Errors in the Spoken French of Grades Two, Four and Six Pupils Enrolled in a French Immersion Program, Simon Fraser University.
Hammerly, H. (1991) Fluency and accuracy. Clcvedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Celce-Murcia, M. (1991) Grammar Pedagogy in Second and Foreign Language Teaching. TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 3., pp. 459-480.
Lightbown, M, P. & Spada, N. (1983) How Languages Are Learned Oxford Handbooks for Language Teachers.
Swain, M. (1998) Interaction and Second Language Learning: Two Adolescent French Immersion Students Working Together, The Modern Language Journal, Volume 82, Issue 3, pp 320–337.
Hinkel, E. & Sandra, F. (2004) New Perspectives on Grammar Teaching in Second Language Classrooms, Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Quinn, C. (2001) mLearning: Mobile, Wireless, In-Your-Pocket Learning, LineZine, Fall 2000, (retrieved January 26, 2007).
Kukulska-Hulme, A. Will mobile learning change language learning? ReCALL, 21(2), 2009. pp. 157–165.
Traxler, J. (2007) Defining, Discussing, and Evaluating Mobile Learning: The moving finger writes and having writ...., International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(2).
Herrington, A., Herrington, J. & Mantei, J. (2009) Design principles for mobile learning. New technologies, new pedagogies: Mobile learning in higher education. University of Wollongong, Wollongong, pp. 129-138.
Sharples, M. & Roschelle, J. (2010). Guest Editorial: Special issue on mobile and ubiquitous technologies for learning. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 3(1).
Pettit, J. and Kukulska-Hulme, A., (2011) Mobile 2.0: crossing the border into formal learning? In: Lee, Mark J.W. and McLoughlin, Catherine eds. Web 2.0-Based E-Learning: Applying Social Informatics for Tertiary Teaching. Information Science Reference. Hershey & New York: IGI Global, pp. 192–208.
Ally, M. (2005). Using learning theories to design instruction for mobile learning devices. Learning and Skills Development Agency, Mobile learning anytime everywhere. A book of papers from MLEARN 2004, 2.Retrieved from
Frohberg, D., Göth and Schwabe (2009) Mobile Learning projects – a critical analysis of the state of the art, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp. 307–331.
Windham, C. (2005). Father Google & mother IM: Confessions of a Net Gen learner. Educause Review, 40(5), 43-58.
Ertmer, P. A., (2005) Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontiers in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4). pp. 25-39.
Smith, S., Tyler, J. M., & Benscote, A. (2000). Internet supported teaching: Advice from the trenches. ED at a Distance, 13(1). Internet.htm
McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6-23.
Kuo, Y.-F., (2003) A study on service quality of virtual community websites. Total Quality Management, 14(4). pp. 461-473.
Whitworth, B., & De Moor, A. (2003). Legitimate by design: Towards trusted socio technical systems. Behaviour and Information Technology, 22(1), 31-51.
Mazer, J.P., Murphy, R.E., & Simmonds, CJ. (2007). I’ll see you on “Facebook”: The effects of computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on student motivation, affective learning, and classroom climate. Communication Education, 56(1), 1-17.
Prensky, M. (2001) Digital Natives. Digital Immigrants, On the Horizon, MCB University Press, Vol. 9 No. 5.
Thorne, S. (2003) Artifacts and cultures-of-use in international communication. Language Learning and Technology, 7(2). pp. 38-67.
Dörnyei, Z. and Csizér, K. (2005). The Effects of Intercultural Contact and Tourism on Language Attitudes and Language Learning Motivation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24(4), 327-357.
Lantolf, J. P. & Thorne, S. L. (2007). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Acquisition. In. B. van Patten & J. Williams (eds.), Explaining Second Language Acquisition (pp. 201-224). Cambridge University Press.
Corbeil, J. R.; Valdes-Corbeil, M. E. (2007) Are You Ready for Mobile Learning? EDUCAUSE Quarterly, v30 n2 p51-58.
Naismith, L., Lonsdale, P., Vavoula, G., & Sharples, M. (2006) Literature review in mobile technologies and learning, Bristol, UK: Futurelab.
(retrieved January 26, 2007).
Kling, R. (1999) What is social informatics and why does it matter? D-Lib Magazine, 5(1). Retrieved November 20, 2008, from
Vasilopoulos, G. (2014) Adapting Communicative Language Instruction in Korean Universities, The Internet TESL Journal, Vol. XIV, No. 8, August 2008.
Browse journals by subject