Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2017, Page: 6-14
The Morphosyntactic Properties in Angguruk Dialect of Yali Language
Simin Althur, Department of Linguistics, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia
Djatmika , Department of English, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia
Wiratno , Department of English, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia
Received: Aug. 24, 2015;       Accepted: Sep. 11, 2015;       Published: Feb. 13, 2017
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijll.20170501.12      View  3091      Downloads  108
This research specifically studied the morphosyntactic property: verb formation process in Angguruk Dialect of Yali Language (thereafter called ADYL). ADYL is one out of 274 local languages in Papua and West-Papua Province. The speaker population of ADYL consists of 15000 persons. The method employed in this research was descriptive qualitative method. The technique of analyzing data used was syntactic basic operating technique called ‘morphological merger’ as logical demand of distributed morphology theory. From the result of analysis, a number of morphosyntactic properties were found supporting the creation of morphosyntactic verb. They were: (1) mood and its sub-classification; (2) aspect and its sub-classification; (3) tense and its sub-classification; (4) the compatibility of subject to its sub-classification (subject agreement); (5) intensifier and its sub-classification; (6) object possessor markerandits sub-classification; (7) accusative object marker and its sub-classification, (8) causative verb marker; (9) reciprocal diathesis marker and its sub-classification, and (10) diathesis marker. All of those morphosyntactic properties have implication to the creation of morphosyntactic verb in ADYL.
Morphosyntactic Property, Morphological Merger, Morphosyntactic Verb (Word)
To cite this article
Simin Althur, Djatmika , Wiratno , The Morphosyntactic Properties in Angguruk Dialect of Yali Language, International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Vol. 5, No. 1, 2017, pp. 6-14. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20170501.12
CashCash, Philips. 2004. Nez Perce Verb Morphology. University of Arizona. (http:// www.u. Arizona.edu.)
Elson, Benjamin, and Velma Pickett. 1969. An Introduction to Morphology and Syntax. Santa Ana, California: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
Foley, William A. (1986). The Papuan Languages of New Guinea. London: Cambridge University Press.
Halle, M., and A. Marantz. 1993. “Distributed Morphology and the Pieces of Inflection”, in K. Halle and S. Kayser (ed.) The View From Building 20: Essay in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 111-176.
Katamba, Francis. 1993. Morphology. London: The Macmillan Press.
Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Noyer, R. 1997. Features, Positions and Affixes in Autonomous Morphological Structure. New York: Garland.
Radford, Andrew. 1997. Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English, a Minimalist Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roland, W. Scholz, and Olaf Tietje. 2002. Embedded Case Study Methods: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Knowledge.(accessed, on July 14, 2012, from: http://www.google.co.id/books?id)
Samarin, W. 1988. IlmuBahasaLapangan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius Pub-lisher
Silzer, Peter J. et.al. 1991. Index of Irian Jaya Languages. Collaboration Program ofCenderawasihUniversity and Summer Institute of Linguistics. Jayapura: SIL.
Stump, Gregory T. 2001. “Inflection”.InThe Handbook of Morphology. Edited by Andrew Spencer, and Arnold M. Zwicky.
Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers Inc. p. 13-43.
Browse journals by subject