Volume 6, Issue 1, January 2018, Page: 15-19
Psychosemiotic Approach to Comprehension, or a Sense Text Model
Nikitina Elena Sergeevna, Psycholinguistics Department, RAS Institute of Linguistics, Moscow, Russia
Received: Oct. 5, 2017;       Accepted: Feb. 6, 2018;       Published: Mar. 2, 2018
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijll.20180601.13      View  887      Downloads  42
Abstract
As a sign formation, text is fundamentally heterogeneous and heterostructural. Since the times of classical rhetoric, three layers have been identified in the text: the object layer, the logical layer, and the language layer. Each had relative independence, which enabled them to be the subject of analysis in a special section of the rhetorical canon. These layers were characterized by their own descriptive logic and ways of processing the material. Sense configuration could proceed in three directions under the influence of three molecular structures of the text: language, logic, theme. Hence, the possibility of three ways of understanding: literal, conceptual and paralogical. However, writing allowed dialogue with the text ("conversation with a book"), i.e. interacting with it as with a subject of communication and trying to understand the sense of the text as of the one which carries the sense of its self measure. The three ways of comprehension - the three semantic systems - must be coordinated, correlated to one another in order to appear as a semantic whole - the face of the text.
Keywords
Text, Sense, Spatial Focusing of Sense, Comprehension
To cite this article
Nikitina Elena Sergeevna, Psychosemiotic Approach to Comprehension, or a Sense Text Model, International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Vol. 6, No. 1, 2018, pp. 15-19. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20180601.13
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Gal'perin, I. R. Tekst kak obyekt lingvisticheskogo issledovanija. Monografija/I. R. Gal'perin. – M.: Nauka, 1981. 140 s.
[2]
Ginzburg K. Mify – jemblemy – primety: Morfologijaiistorija. Sb. statej/Per. s it. iposlesl. S. L. Kozlova. – M.: Novoe izdatel'stvo, 2004. 348 s.
[3]
Lotman, Ju. M. Semiotika kul'tury I ponjatie teksta// Istorija I tipologija russkoj kul'tury/ Ju. M. Lotman. – SPb.: Iskusstvo - SPB, 2002. S. 158–162.
[4]
Bart, R. Ot proizvedenija k tekstu//Bart R. Izbrannye raboty: Semiotika: Pojetika: Per.s fr./ R. Bart. – M.: Progress. 1989. S. 413-423.
[5]
Piaget, J. The development of object concept: The construction of reality in the child /J. Piaget.– New York: Basic Books, 1954. Pp. 3-96.
[6]
Nikitina, E. S. Smyslovoj analiz teksta: Psihosemioticheskij podhod/E. S. Nikitina.– M.: LENAND, 2016. 200 s.
[7]
Bahtin, M. M. Problema teksta v lingvistike, filologii i drugih gumanitarnyh naukah. Opyt filosofskogo analiza//Jestetika slovesnogo tvorchestva/M. M. Bahtin. – M.: Iskusstvo, 1979. 424 s.
[8]
Origen. O nachalah. Protiv Cel'sa. Kn. 4 (Po izdaniju Kazanskoj Duhovnoj Akademii, 1892)/Origen.–SPb.: Bibliopolis, 2008. 792 s.
[9]
Mak-Ljujen, Marshall. Galaktika Gutenberga: Sotvorenie cheloveka pechatnoj kul'tury/M.mak-Ljujen. – Kiev: Nika-Centr, 2004. 432 s.
[10]
Raushenbah. B. V. Logika troichnosti / B. V. Raushenbah // Voprosy filosofii. –1993– № 3. S. 63-70.
Browse journals by subject