Archive




Volume 8, Issue 1, January 2020, Page: 46-49
A Review on the Book of On the Symbiosis of Discourse Types
Youping Jing, School of Translation Studies, Shandong University, Weihai, China
Received: Jan. 11, 2020;       Accepted: Feb. 17, 2020;       Published: Feb. 26, 2020
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijll.20200801.16      View  71      Downloads  47
Abstract
This paper gives a critical review on the book of On the Symbiosis of Discourse Types. In this book, the author, Xinfang Liu clarifies the symbiosis of the three discourse types from the perspective of rhetorical reciprocity, and proposes a comprehensive model of discourse types in the writing practice. He finds that the current problems of English writing teaching in China are the gaps between writing teaching research, textbook research and the publication of foreign language writing textbooks, and the rigidity and abstraction in the textbook edition and the writing teaching processes, thus applying the model of discourse types to the English writing teaching. Therefore, the strengths of this book lie in both theoretical and practical aspects. Besides the advantages, this book can be refined by illustrating the theory based on a corpus about everyday conversations for the studies of discourse types are closely related to people’s daily life. In addition, this work can also be improved by paying more attention to the differences between first language writing and the foreign language one because the thinking patterns and cultures lying in these two are not similar.
Keywords
Discourse Types, Symbiosis, English Writing Teaching
To cite this article
Youping Jing, A Review on the Book of On the Symbiosis of Discourse Types, International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Vol. 8, No. 1, 2020, pp. 46-49. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20200801.16
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Beaugrande, R. and W. Dressler. (1981). Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman.
[2]
Johansson, S. (1985). Word Frequency and Text Type: Some Observations Based on the LOB Corpus of British English Texts. Computers and the Humanities, 19 (1): 23-36.
[3]
Liu, Y. & J., Li. (2019). On the Restriction of Text Types on the Use of Complex Sentences. Journal of Central China Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 58 (1): 105-109.
[4]
Johns, A. M. (1997). Text, Role, and Context: Developing Academic Literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[5]
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. New York: Longman.
[6]
Bhatia, V. K. (2015). Critical Reflections on Genre Analysis. In Artemeva, N. and A. Freedman (Eds.). Genre Studies Around the Globe: Beyond the Three Traditions. Winnipeg: Inkshed Publications, 17-30.
[7]
Longacre, R. E. (1983). The Grammar of Discourse. New York: Plenum Press.
[8]
Bhatia, V. K. (2004). Worlds of Written Discourse. London: Continuum.
[9]
Bhatia, V. K. (2017). Critical Genre Analysis: Investigating Interdiscursive Performance in Professional Practice. New York: Routledge.
[10]
Tardy, C. M. (2009). Building Genre Knowledge. West Lafayette: Parlor Press.
[11]
Xin, B. (2000). Intertextuality from a Critical Perspective. Suzhou: Suzhou University Press.
[12]
Hyon, S. (1996). Genre in Three Traditions: Implications for ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 30 (4): 693-722.
[13]
Bitzer, L. F. (1968). The Rhetorical Situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1 (1): 1-14.
[14]
Burke, K. (1973). The Rhetorical Situation. In Thayer, L. (Ed.). Communication: Ethical and Moral Issues. New York: Gordon and Breach, Science Publishers, 263-275.
[15]
Richards, I. A. (1936). The Philosophy of Rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press, 1936.
[16]
Bakhtin, M. M. (2009). The Complete Works of Bakhtin. Trans. Bai Chunren et al. Shijiazhuang: Hebei Education Press.
[17]
Habermas, J. Communication Action Theory [M]. Trans. Cao Weidong. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House, 200
[18]
Connors, R. J. (1981). The Rise and Fall of the Modes of Discourse. College Composition and Communication, 32 (4): 444-455.
[19]
Connors, R. J. (1997). Composition- Rhetoric: Backgrounds, Theory, and Pedagogy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
[20]
Gao, X. & Q., Wen. (2017). Effects of Critical Thinking Skills via Linguistic Factors on L2 Writing Performance. Foreign Language Learning and Theory. (4): 44-50.
[21]
Ren Z. & R., Hitchcock (2013) Influences of Chinese Cultural Patterns of Thinking on Discourse Organization in English Dissertation Writing. In: Coverdale-Jones T. (eds) Transnational Higher Education in the Asian Context. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Browse journals by subject