Archive




Volume 8, Issue 4, July 2020, Page: 164-173
Vowel Hiatus Resolution Processes as Delimiters of Prosodic Domains in Kisa
Emily Ayieta Ondondo, Ayieta Ondondo
Received: Jul. 6, 2020;       Accepted: Jul. 21, 2020;       Published: Aug. 10, 2020
DOI: 10.11648/j.ijll.20200804.17      View  86      Downloads  34
Abstract
In a language, certain phenomena are sensitive to specific prosodic domains. In a model of morphology syntax phonology interaction in which morphological and syntactic structure projects phonological domains belonging to a set hierarchy, each phonological process refers to a specific level of that hierarchy. Therefore, describing a phonological process generally requires specifying the domain within which it applies. In Kisa, a Bantu language spoken in Western Kenya, a sequence of two vowels with different qualities is unacceptable. The ill-formed sequence is repaired through at least one of the vowel processes: gliding, coalescence, raising, assimilation and deletion. These vowel processes involve vowels occurring at different morphological and syntactic boundaries and apply within different prosodic domains in Kisa. Using a qualitative descriptive design and basing on data generated by the author as a native speaker of Kisa, this study identifies and describes the boundaries at which and the prosodic domains in which the vowel processes stated above apply. The findings show that unacceptable vowel sequences occur both at morphological and syntactic boundaries in Kisa. The strategies used to repair the unwanted vowel sequences at each boundary differ depending on the combining vowels. Further, the findings of the study show that the vowel processes attested in the language apply in different domains.
Keywords
Kisa, Vowel Hiatus Resolution, Prosodic Domain, Morphological-Syntactic Boundary, Gliding, Coalescence, Assimilation, Deletion
To cite this article
Emily Ayieta Ondondo, Vowel Hiatus Resolution Processes as Delimiters of Prosodic Domains in Kisa, International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Vol. 8, No. 4, 2020, pp. 164-173. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20200804.17
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Nespor, M. & Vogel, I. (1986). Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
[2]
McCarthy, J. (2011). Pausal Phonology and Morpheme Realization. In T. Borowsky, S. Kawahara, T. Shinya & M. Sugahara (Eds.), Prosody Matters: Essays in Honor of Lisa Selkirk. London: Equinox. Available at: http://works.bepress.com/john_j_mccarthy/4.
[3]
McCarthy, J. & Prince, A. (1995). Prosodic Morphology. In J. Goldsmith (Ed.) The Handbook of Phonological Theory (pp. 318-366). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
[4]
Selkirk, E. (1980). Prosodic Domains in Phonology: Sanskrit Revisited. In M. Aronoff & M-L. Kean (Eds.), Juncture (pp. 107-29). Saratoga, CA: Anma Libri.
[5]
Elfner, E. (2018). The syntax-prosody interface: current theoretical approaches and outstanding questions. Linguistics Vanguard, 1-14.
[6]
Hamlaoui, F. & Kriszta S. (2017). The syntax-phonology mapping of intonational phrases in complex sentences: A flexible approach. In L. Clemens & E. Elfner (eds.), Special collection: Prosody & constituent structure. Glossa, 2 (1). 55.
[7]
Windsor, J. W. (2017). Predicting prosodic structure by morphosyntactic category: A case study of Blackfoot. In L. Clemens & E. Elfner (eds.), Special collection: Prosody & constituent structure. Glossa, 2 (1). 10.
[8]
Gibbon, D. & Sascha G. (2017). Multilinear Grammar: Ranks and Interpretations. Open Linguistics, 3 (1).
[9]
Niebuhr, O. & Nigel, G. W, (eds.). (2018). Prosody and Pragmatic Functions. Special issue of JIPA, 48 (1).
[10]
Casali, R. F. (1997). Vowel Elision in Hiatus Contexts: Which Vowel Goes? Language, 73 (3), 493-534.
[11]
Pulleyblank, D. (2003). Yoruba Vowel Patterns: Asymmetries Through Phonological Competition. Ms, University of British Columbia.
[12]
Rosenthall, S. (1994). Vowel/Glide Interaction in a Theory of Constraint Interaction. University of Massachusetts-Amherst Doctoral dissertation.
[13]
Sibanda, G. (2009). Vowel Processes in Nguni: Resolving the Problem of Unacceptable VV Sequences. In M. Matondo, F. Mc Laughlin & E. Potsdam (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference on African Linguistics: Linguistic Theory and African Language Documentation (pp. 38-55). Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
[14]
Harford, C. (1997). When Two Vowels Go Walking: Vowel Coalescence in Shona. Zambezia, 24, 69-85.
[15]
Mtenje, A. (2007). On Recent Trends in Phonology: Vowel Sequences in Bantu Languages. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics, 15, 33-48.
[16]
Sample, W. A. (1976). The Application of Rules in the Phonology of Olukisa. Indiana University Doctoral Dissertation.
[17]
Tanner, D. S. (2006). Context Insensitive Vowel Hiatus Resolution in Ciyao. University of Washington working papers in Linguistics Online 25.
[18]
Pulleyblank, D. (1988). Vocalic Underspecification in Yoruba. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 233 270.
[19]
Akinlabi, A. (1993). Underspecification and the Phonology of Yoruba /r/. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 139-160.
[20]
Pulleyblank, D. (1998). Yoruba Vowel Patterns: Deriving Asymmetries by the Tension Between Opposing Constraints. Paper presented at the South Western Optimality Theory Conference, University of Arizona.
[21]
Buchstaller, I., & Khattab, G. (2003). Population Samples. Data without generalisation is just gossip. Pirsing 1991: 55, in Chambers 2003: xix.
[22]
Chomsky, N. (1962). The Logical Basis of Linguistic Theory. International Congress of Linguists. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
[23]
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. London: Sage Publication.
[24]
Vaux, B., & Cooper, J. (2005). Introduction to Linguistic Field Methods. Muenchen: LINCOM GmbH Publisher.
[25]
Selkirk, E. (1978). On Prosodic Structure and Its Relation to Syntactic Structure. In T. Fretheim (Ed.), Nordic Prosody (pp. 111-140). Trondheim: TAPIR.
[26]
Selkirk, E. (1984). Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[27]
Selkirk, E. (1986). On Derived Domains in Sentence Phonology. Phonology, 3, 371-405.
[28]
Nespor, M. & Vogel, I. (1982). Prosodic Domains of External Sandhi Rules. In H. van der Hulst & N. Smith (Eds.), The Structure of Phonological Representations (pp. 225-265). Dordrecht: Foris.
[29]
Hayes, B. (1984). The Phonology of Rhythm in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 33-74.
[30]
Hyman, L. M. & Katamba, F. (2001). The Word in Luganda. In E. Voeltz (Ed.), Proceedings of Cologne Conference on Typology.
[31]
Spencer, A. (1986). Towards a Theory of Phonological Development. Lingua, 68, 3-38.
[32]
Spencer, A. (1996). Phonology Theory and Description. Oxford: Blackwell.
Browse journals by subject